Commons:Valued image candidates

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques. Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria. A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope. The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules. An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR. If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links: Main VI page Valued image candidates Valued image criteria Valued image scope Valued image value Nomination procedure Review procedure Most Valued Review Promotion rules Valued image closure How to nominate an image for VI status Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review. Adding a new nomination (image) Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button. Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage. Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section: |My-image-filename.jpg so that it looks like this: {{VICs ... |My-image-filename.jpg }} and save the candidate list. Renomination Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review. Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination. Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination. Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in |date={{subst:VI-time}} Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review). Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with |nominator=~~~ Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure. Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}") replace the review parameter with |review= {{subst:VIC-archive}} }} Save the page. There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews. Save the previous reviews archive page Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list. How to open a Most Valued Review There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: === Scope === {{VICs |candidate1.jpg |candidate2.jpg }} where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR. The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing. How to review the candidates How to review an image Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it). Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion. Review procedure On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters. Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six. Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination. Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries. If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued. If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR. Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows: You type You get When *{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~  Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment. *{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~  Info My information. -- Example You have information. *{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote. *{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria. *{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~  Question My question. -- Example You have a question. *{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria. If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template. Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page. How to update the status Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate: status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border). status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border). status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border). status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border). Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized. Changes in scope during the review period The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

55,127 closed valued image candidates
Closed as				Nominations
Promoted			49,557 (89.9%)
Undecided			3,079 (5.6%)
Declined			2,491 (4.5%)

New valued image nominations

View Nominated by: Tupungato (talk) on 2024-05-16 11:53 (UTC) Scope: Furniture restorer (Relevant category: Furniture restoration) Used in: en:Conservation and restoration of cultural property, en:Antique furniture and 14 other Reason: A few similar images are diluted across many categories in Commons, but I believe it's the best in scope nonetheless. -- Tupungato (talk) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Tupungato (talk) on 2024-05-16 12:30 (UTC) Scope: Irrigation sprinklers in vineyards (Relevant categories: Irrigation sprinklers, Vineyards) Used in: en:Irrigation sprinkler, tr:Şarapçılık and 21 other Reason: I believe Irrigation sprinklers in vineyards is a super useful scope, but there is no perfect Commons category for this. Commons category tree for agriculture infrastructure is somewhat neglected. -- Tupungato (talk)  Comment The scope is too broad. the most suitable Commons category would perhaps be Vineyards in Trentino-South Tyrol, if you wish to be more precise see this section in Guide des vins du Trentin Haut Adige. --Pierre André (talk) 10:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Martinvl (talk) on 2024-05-17 14:01 (UTC) Scope: Drawbridge, Hever Castle Reason: This image was taken for use in schools to illustrate the use of a drawbridge and portcullis in a medieval castle. -- Martinvl (talk) Open for review.	View promotion Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-19 15:34 (UTC) Scope: Town hall of La Couture (Pas-de-Calais), view from Rue du Rietz (Fr) Used in: Global usage  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-19 16:28 (UTC) Scope: Bombus terrestris (large earth bumblebee), in flight, loaded with pollen  Comment We need binomial nomenclature: gender is not enough.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)  Done, thank you -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)  Support perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Found the scope with two conditioning subscopes - "in flight" and "loaded with pollen", to be rather narrow but still acceptable as both attributes are related to species behavior. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-19 20:00 (UTC) Scope: Mass grave of kolkhoz activists in Volodarka Used in: Global usage  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-20 04:49 (UTC) Scope: Portrait of Philip III by Juan Pantoja de la Cruz Musée Goya, Castres France  Support Useful and used, --Pierre André (talk) 08:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-20 04:53 (UTC) Scope: Saint John the Baptist and Saint Paul by Jacobello di Bonomo - Museo Correr  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-20 05:12 (UTC) Scope: Callista erycina (Reddish Venus), right valve  Support Useful and used.--Pierre André (talk) 08:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Contributor2020Talk to me here! on 2024-05-20 07:13 (UTC) Scope: Architecture in Gaganbawada Reason: This image is a very high quality image of a historically important "wada" or a large mansion. It was the home of Pant Amatya Bawadekar, who was the finance minister of the Maratha Empire, a dominant empire in the 1700s. -- Contributor2020Talk to me here!  Comment Perspective correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)  Question I couldn't understand under which context you are talking about. --Contributor2020Talk to me here! 14:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment Are the columns leaning naturally or not? If this is not the case, reality is distorted and the value of the image is greatly altered.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Columns are definitely leaning naturally. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 06:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Contributor2020Talk to me here! on 2024-05-20 07:16 (UTC) Scope: Artifacts in Gaganbawada  Comment The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Archaeodontosaurus, what scope do you suggest? --Contributor2020Talk to me here! 14:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment You need to know what this artifact is...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Contributor2020Talk to me here! on 2024-05-20 07:23 (UTC) Scope: Hills in Gaganbawada  Comment There is no name of the mountain or geocoding in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)  Partially done I have done the geocoding, however I couldn't update the "name" of the hill as the hill is nameless. It belongs to a particular subcategory of the range which is "Bhubawada Ghat" --Contributor2020Talk to me here! 13:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-20 10:00 (UTC) Scope: Statue of reclining Buddha in the central Prasat of Angkor Wat, Cambodia Used in: Global usage  Best in Scope. --Contributor2020Talk to me here! 14:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 10:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Gpkp (talk) on 2024-05-20 15:32 (UTC) Scope: Ravi Shastri, cricket commentator and former Indian cricket coach and player Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Shishirdasika on 2024-05-20 14:16 (UTC) Scope: Rajgruha Rajgruha Used in: బి.ఆర్. అంబేద్కర్ రాజగృహం,Rajgruha  Comment Perspective correction necessary and scope is too broad. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-20 16:45 (UTC) Scope: Schloss Wildenberg (Zernez) Entrance gate to the garden.  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-20 19:37 (UTC) Scope: Mass grave of the victims of Holodomor in Yakymivka Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-21 05:13 (UTC) Scope: Callista erycina (Reddish Venus), left valve  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-21 05:09 (UTC) Scope: Medal of a Bookshelf (Museo Correr)  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-21 05:11 (UTC) Scope: Saint Anthony of Padua, 18th century Spanish school, Musée Goya of Castres  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-21 05:12 (UTC) Scope: Church of Santa San Gaetano - in Treviso Italy  Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 08:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-21 09:07 (UTC) Scope: Italia and Germania by Friedrich Overbeck (Neue Pinakothek), München (De)  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-21 19:55 (UTC) Scope: World War II memorial in Yakymivka Used in: Global usage  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 16:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-21 22:37 (UTC) Scope: Equipment (detail) of Achaemenid soldiers.- (SB 33177), in museum of Louvre -Lens (Fr) Used in: Global usage Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-22 04:18 (UTC) Scope: North facade of Porta Nigra Detail right side in Trèves.  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-22 05:09 (UTC) Scope: Quatro santi - Pittore veneto Sec. XV - Museo Correr  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-22 05:11 (UTC) Scope: Altarpiece of Saint Martin - The Assumption Musée Goya, Castres France  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-22 05:39 (UTC) Scope: Church of Sant'Agostino - in Treviso Italy  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 16:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-22 05:34 (UTC) Scope: Crassostrea angulata (Portuguese oyster), right valve  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-22 16:36 (UTC) Scope: Mini Countryman (U25) John Cooper Works - left rear view Used in: de:Mini Countryman, en:Mini Countryman  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-22 16:53 (UTC) Scope: Vicus pottery of the modeled vase in Ceramic Nr ML031834, in Musum Larco (Lima) Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-22 19:21 (UTC) Scope: Fiat 1905 - Isotta Fraschini 1917 - left rear view  Support Best in scope --Pierre André (talk) 21:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-22 19:26 (UTC) Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Yushkivtsi Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Shougissime (talk) on 2024-05-22 21:11 (UTC) Scope: Tadej Pogačar - in race Used in: fr:5e étape du Tour de France 2023, en:Tadej Pogačar,et:Tadej Pogačar; nl:Tadej Pogačar, ca:Tadej Pogačar Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: dllu (t,c) on 2024-05-22 22:18 (UTC) Scope: Remote views of Jintai Temple Used in: Jintai Temple Zhuhai Reason: Much better quality than other photos in Category:Jintai Temple (Zhuhai) -- dllu (t,c)  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-23 04:14 (UTC) Scope: Budding leaf bud of a Hydrangea anomala subsp. petiolaris (climbing hydrangea)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-23 05:12 (UTC) Scope: Crassostrea angulata (Portuguese oyster), left valve  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-23 05:15 (UTC) Scope: Madonna con il Bambino by Francesco Benaglio - Museo Correr Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-23 05:35 (UTC) Scope: Le Duel by Valentin Jumel de Noireterre in Goya Museum‎ Castres France  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-23 05:21 (UTC) Scope: The martyrdom - Storie di sant'Orsola by Tommaso da Modena- Complesso di Santa Caterina - Treviso  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-05-23 14:57 (UTC) Scope: CTMA Voyageur 2 - IMO 9119402 - starboard view Reason: Best starboard view of this ship by name. -- GRDN711 (talk)  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-23 16:14 (UTC) Scope: Trachylepis striata (African striped skink)  Support Best in scope. --Pierre André (talk) 08:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-23 19:57 (UTC) Scope: Mass grave of 62 Soviet soldiers in Yushkivtsi Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: WildMouse76 (talk) on 2024-05-24 01:16 (UTC) Scope: Cygnus olor swimming (juvenile in November)  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-24 04:18 (UTC) Scope: Decoration on the vaults of the Reformierte Kirche Zernez (interior) Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-24 05:08 (UTC) Scope: Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Asklepios (inv.364)  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 08:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-24 05:13 (UTC) Scope: Lutrin - Ecole française du XVIIIe - Marbre de Caune Minervois - Musée Goya. Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-24 05:15 (UTC) Scope: The Pope's dream - Storie di sant'Orsola by Tommaso da Modena- Complesso di Santa Caterina - Treviso Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-24 05:26 (UTC) Scope: Malleus albus (White hammer oyster), right valve  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Drow male (talk) on 2024-05-24 07:07 (UTC) Scope: Bernardo Penabade is a Galician philologist, teacher and writer. Used in: Global usage Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-24 10:38 (UTC) Scope: Dacia Jogger Hybrid - left rear view Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates

Remote view of Florence Duomo by night

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Mile (talk) on 2015-03-11 15:22 (UTC) Scope: Remote view of Florence Duomo by nigth Reason: So far best nigth/dusk photo from Michelangelo hill, would say best remote view in general (dusk view is far more beneficial - colors). -- Mile (talk)  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 17:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: dllu (t,c) on 2024-05-22 20:30 (UTC) Scope: Remote view of Florence Duomo by night Reason: In my opinion technically superior to existing VI File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg -- dllu (t,c) Open for review.

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London Used in: en:Bertrand Russell, de, es  Comment This is the most valuable image in scope, but only if the scope does not include the base. If the scope includes the base, we have to consider whether the dark File:Bust of Bernard Russell in Red Lion Square (01).jpg is better than File:I feel I almost know this guy - geograph.org.uk - 1656321.jpg, which is fenced off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC) I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London  Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 10:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.