User talk:Basilicofresco

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Basilicofresco's mailbox
Basilicofresco's mailbox

Archives: 1may08-may10

Citroën DS 1976 (camera car).jpg[edit]

Are you really sure File:Citroën DS 1976 (camera_car).jpg is a Citroën DS? Citroën DS looks pretty different: File:1975_Citroen_DS.JPG. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 13:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the camera automobile is a DS, but is hidden by the guy at the right. The visible part of car is a Peugeot 504, used as a movie set. I have modified the image description to make things clearer (it is a pity I did not shoot the front of the car...). .:DS (shhht...):. 11:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file uploaded by you is under deletion request[edit]

Several files you uploaded from the Remote Sensing Tutorial from NASA Goddard Space Center have been tagged for deletion since that tutorial acknowledges that not all of the used images are actually NASA. (See here the overview of the tutorial). The group deletion request is here. Comments would be welcomed.--Garrondo (talk) 11:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Fukang_meteorite.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fukang_meteorite.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fukang_meteorite.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas_Bopp_holding_a_meteorite.jpg[edit]

File:Thomas_Bopp_holding_a_meteorite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gamaliel (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pultusk meteorite strewnfield.png[edit]

There is an error report on your illustration File:Pultusk meteorite strewnfield.png. One of the users from pl:wiki explains, that (according to press reports from thea date of the impact) the Pultusk meteorite travelled form SW to NE, which is quite opposite to the arrow direction on your illustration. There are newspaper facsimiles at [1] (in Polish). Could you check it up, and possibly correct the error? Regards, Mulat (talk) 11:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename request for File:NWA 3151meteorite, brachinite.jpg[edit]

Dear Basilicofresco, you've requested to rename File:NWA 3151meteorite, brachinite.jpg to File:NWA 3151 meteorite, brachinite.jpg. However, your request couldn't be carried out, because there's already another file with that name. Feel free to request a different renaming. Kind regards, Mathonius (talk) 07:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soybean_oil.jpg[edit]

File:Soybean_oil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kelly (talk) 03:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DougBot[edit]

Thanks for bringing my attention back to my request. I've made the test run as requested after a little mind changing on my part as to how much I was going to do in one shot. At first I thought to do a simple edit just to demonstrate but then decided to fix the whole issue at once and created the autocatting template and applied it with the bot. Along the way, I managed to find at least two bugs in replace.py.--User:Doug(talk • contribs) 12:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Image Finder Bot[edit]

Then you will request for any image. I will find it for you.--P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 07:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valerio Massimo Manfredi.jpg[edit]

File:Valerio Massimo Manfredi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jaqen (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Bots/Requests/FrescoBot[edit]

Per discussion there, please can you test the upload component of your proposed bot with a run of around 50 files. --99of9 (talk) 06:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks, I didn't understand at first. Bot approved, enjoy! --99of9 (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bot fixes[edit]

Hi Basilicofresco,

This fix seems to break a category name. Obviously, the name Category:Row houses in Washington, D.C, isn't ideal. Category:Row houses in Washington, D.C (currently no category description page) has already 113 entries.

That change seems to break the attribution requirement. --  Docu  at 22:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC) (edited)[reply]

The first issue is not actually an error: it is the best guess to fix a problem. In this particular case it is not enough, but at least it attracts the attention and therefore the category can be fixed. I will fix the trailing comma on sunday. The second issue instead is less obvious: the link points the very same page, it is clickable in the very same way, reports the same text description, if you copy and paste the attribution in word processor the result is the same: the attribution is intact. In my opinions looks good, what is the problem? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 23:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The first fix is a problem. I don't think the fixes should run within category names.
I would have thought the expand fix would have an effect on the "Use this file on the web" button, but oddly it doesn't. Maybe both versions are a problem with that script in general. --  Docu  at 03:09, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The gadget can't read the wikitext. It's assembling the information from some special HTML-fields that are exposed by the licensing templates and {{Information}}. If authors want special attribution, they should use the |attribution=-parameter of the license-templates. -- RE rillke questions? 16:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure either if your but should be removing image source links, e.g. here. --  Docu  at 03:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JFYI: There is a block request on COM:AN/B for your bot. -- RE rillke questions? 16:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry for the delay. I stopped the bot. I will fix it on sunday, as soon I will come back home. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 10:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 and 31 I was less responsive than usual because I was taking some intercontinental flights in a row... Next time I will stop the bot even if everything seems going well. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 17:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issue "fixing the category name"[edit]

Also category names gets misspelled. Nevertheless I will check the edits in order to evaluate costs/benefits. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 17:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixings on cagegories will be performed manually. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 04:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issue "conversion of fake external links"[edit]

About the conversion of fake external links (to ns0, ns6 and ns14) in wikilinks, I took a look at this one and I do not understand exactly why the "long link in the wikisource" version should be better than the "wikilink in the wikisource" version. I mean for example the source field is already a wikilink and if you click on "Use this file on the web" with the FrescoBot version in the author field you read "...based on Image:Granada - Mapa municipal.svg created by Emilio..." instead of "...based on [1] created by Emilio...". I took a look also here and I saw no problems or differences. Anyway, can we open a discussion about it? I have no interest in edits that do not help the project so it is important to understand what is the better solution. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 17:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One week ago I asked in Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Conversion of fake external links within attribution or source and nobody found any problem with the conversion of fake external links within attribution or source fields. I think it was the most appropriate place. If there will be no objections during the next week, I will start again the link syntax fixing script. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 06:33, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Syntax fix by FrescoBot[edit]

Hello Basilicofresco, this syntax fix by your bot caused the disappearance of the entire description section, problaby due to a syntax error occuring now in the template, which is caused by the strange characters in the web link. Maybe you could have a look at this. Thank you very much, best wishes --Hareinhardt (talk) 23:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The problem occours when there are = inside the translated text (inside or outside a link). The odd thing is that inside [[ ]] the equals are ignored. The page was well fixed by Docu. I will improve my script in order to check and fix also this problem and avoid similar situations. Thank you. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 15:57, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Hi Basilicofresco, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
--Sreejith K (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Geograph[edit]

Hi Basilicofresco,

If you edit geograph descriptions, you might want to include the cleanup suggested at Commons:Bots/Work_requests/Archive_5#.C2.93_and_.C2.94. --  Docu  at 11:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion! Did you notice any other invisible character in these descriptions? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 12:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well these are visible ;)
They could probably be replaced with a " or ''
A thing that is generally missing IMHO, is a colon or a full stop after the title of the image when repeated in the description (sample: diff, title is "Tall Ships event, Belfast" (also in the filename), it is followed by "Looking across the Lagan"). --  Docu  at 12:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in the meantime, {{int:license}} should be {{int:license-header}} --  Docu  at 13:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, these characters are not visible on my system with Firefox or Chrome, they are visible only with IE. So, along with these link fixes, now I'm going to add also the full stop and replace (outside the links):

  • “ and ” with "
  • ’ (U+0092) with '
  • {{int:license}} with {{int:license-header}}

Basilicofresco (msg) 13:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Thanks for fixing them. --  Docu  at 13:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too slow?[edit]

Hi Basilicofresco,

Just to let you know that I mentioned your bot at Commons_talk:Bots. If you plan on finishing the geograph cleanup in the near future, it should probably run at a much faster pace. --  Docu  at 10:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:FrescoBot[edit]

Congratulations! New task was approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 15:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No-op fix by FrescoBot?[edit]

Check out this strange edit your bot made. I can't see any difference between the revisions, although apparently MediaWiki can. Any idea? -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 22:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not easy to see the difference: there was an invisible misplaced control character (ltr mark) between "Cyatheales" and "]]". This invisible character causes problems for example with some category tools. If you cut and paste "Cyatheales‎]]" and try to use backspace on it you will notice the invisible character. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 00:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'll be damned! So there is. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 03:28, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked FrescoBot due to it breaking links[edit]

Hello, I've decided to block your bot for the time beeing, as it's breaking links, as seen at Revision of File:US Navy 111026-N-OY799-125 Sailors stand lee helmsman and helmsman in the bridge aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN rectlinearized.jpg. We can't change link targets without as well fix the original filename it points to. →AzaToth 10:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, surprisingly I forgot to consider this case. I just added it to bot exclusions. I'm tracing back this kind of occurrences in order to revert any improper edit. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 11:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found all the affected pages: reverted 8 edits. Thank you for pointing it out! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 16:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've unblocked the bot now. →AzaToth 17:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth?[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Petrova_crkva-zvonik.JPG&curid=1965822&diff=74823098&oldid=65270408 - what exactly is an "invisible LTR mark"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattbuck (talk • contribs) 02:43, 25 lug 2012 (UTC)

Hi! See User:FrescoBot/Misplaced invisible LTR marks -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Read the link and still fail to see what this bot is doing: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Doric_Temple_Athena_Lindos.jpg&diff=75097724&oldid=70073802 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saffron Blaze (talk • contribs) 22:43, 29 lug 2012‎ (UTC)

Take a look at this link, you will see what characters are present in "Lindia‎]]". -- Basilicofresco (msg) 06:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think the question is, how on earth the invisible sign comes between a and ] and why typing a] sometimes gives ainvisble sign that I not typed]? --Martin H. (talk) 18:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering about that as well. Maybe it's inserted due to the sign being present in some MediaWiki message or HotCat code and gets pasted along when copying categories. --  Docu  at 20:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect in my case the code was introduced via copy/paste actions, as I distinctly remember copy/passting that title into the uploader text field. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:52, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting edit from bare link to a ref[edit]

Howdy. Your bot recently made this edit. I think the previous version was better. What are your thoughts on this?--Rockfang (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. In this case (fake external link, without text, at the end of a sentence, at the end of a section) on Commons is better to use brackets than refs. Fixed, thank you. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 18:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply and for the fix.--Rockfang (talk) 20:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.adventurediving.it/[edit]

As far as i can see, this website have a copyright tag and no permission. See here also --Smooth_O (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protezione pagine[edit]

Ciao. Di solito si proteggono se sono molto usate o ad alto rischio vandalismo, ma devono essere molto molto usate perche' spesso anche queste immagini vengono modificate per motivi tecnici o grafici magari anche solo una volta l'anno. Non so, se sai di qualche immagine particolare che e' su pagine ad altissimo traffico o a rischio vandalismo indicamele pure che le proteggo (o usa Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections per segnalarle).--Trixt (talk) 19:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Convert all interlaced JPGs[edit]

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nemo! At the moment I have no spare time, but the next week I should be able to come back on Wiki and I'll take a look at that request. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 06:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Grazie mille, come vedi c'è chi ci ha provato ma gli script bash non sono efficacissimi, serve un po' di python. Peraltro se anche volessi "solo" scriverlo o dare qualche suggerimento per correggere i tentativi precedenti qualcuno potrebbe fare del resto.
Ho appena pubblicato la lista delle altre immagini potenzialmente da convertire, sono mezzo milione! Ciao, Nemo 23:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ci sono novità? Posso aiutare in qualche modo? --Nemo 14:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scusa se poi non sono nemmeno intervenuto nella discussione, purtroppo è stato un brutto periodo e sono sovraccarico di impegni. Per fortuna vedo che la situazione in gennaio si è sbloccata... -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meteorites_found_in_Antartica[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Meteorites_found_in_Antartica has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Dobie80 (talk) 20:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Category:Meteorites found in Antarctica. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 16:40, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Canyon diablo endcut.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Canyon diablo endcut.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was not the original uploader. The original image on ru.wiki was deleted: ru:File:Метеорит Canyon Diablo.jpg. It appears that the original license became not acceptable. I suggest to delete this image. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 11:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The original license was "Fair use". I tagged the image for speedy deletion. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 16:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected: 

Eleassar (t/p) 07:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Honl, Deepcon 11.jpg[edit]

File:David Honl, Deepcon 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Davidhonl (talk) 14:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

El nino north american weather.png and others[edit]

Hi,

I've noticed that your bot has made changes to the categories of some of the images I follow. When I look at the edit, I cannot see what is the difference (for instance https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:El_nino_north_american_weather.png&curid=3737997&diff=117037490&oldid=77745526). Could you tell me what has been modified?

Pierre cb (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The bot is removing invisible LTR characters, take a look here. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 23:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Helmet from Vendel.jpg‎[edit]

Hello. May I ask, what exactly did the bot do here: [2] ? Thank you. Jan Kameníček (talk) 12:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The bot removed an invisible LTR character, take a look here. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 16:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious about a bot edit of yours[edit]

Hi there, I was just curious about a bot edit of yours. There is nothing is wrong, im just curious what the edit actually did because visually i cant tell. Here's the diff. In the file history it says the edit removed 3 bytes. Again, just me being curious. Thanks, Dainomite (talk) 03:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The bot removed an invisible LTR special character, take a look here. This fix is part of a larger set of fixes so at the moment I can't use a more specific edit summary... but I understand it can be confusing. I will try to solve the problem. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 06:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for the edits of your bot?[edit]

Hello Basilicofresco! Currently your bot is editing nearly all of my images, only one example. What exactly is the rationale for the edits? When I take a look into the diffs I do not see any relevant differences. Why are there illegal characters in the category names of my images? What can I do to avoid these characters in the future? I usually use Cat a lot of categorization. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The bot removed an invisible LTR character, take a look here and here. For example in that case in "(Essen)‎]]" there is a misplaced special character between (Essen) and ]]. I believe that the main reason for these LTR characters inside the category links are copy/paste actions from a category list. However recently they are getting more and more frequent, so I'm wondering if there are other sources. Do you remember if you inserted these categories by coping/pasting from a category page? If you copy and paste [[Category:Exterior of Alte Synagoge (Essen)‎]] inside this webpage you will be able to see it as U200E character. This proble should not happen with automated tools without coping/pasting.... can you confirm it? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 07:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:FrescoBot[edit]

Although I see the usefulness of this task, I don't think your bot should touch author fields. Thanks for running it anyway,    FDMS  4    17:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix this issue!    FDMS  4    21:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The bot will skip it, but it makes no sense. The author field is not black magic: if there is a typo and fixing it does not affect the meaning of the attribution then we should fix it. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 22:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meteoriti[edit]

Ciao Basilico, grazie dell'interessante segnalazione! Premesso che tutto quello che so di mineralogia sono reminescenze di scuola media, porendo atto con piacere di quelle che mi segnali. Magari posso solo dire che una categoria Ataxite ecc, per quanto possa essere banale, potrebbe essere utile crearla comunque, fosse solo per poterla collegare agli articoli di wikipedia, casomai qualcuno volesse cercare più immagini sull'argomento. Veniamo ora nel dettaglio:

Non sapendo il significato di quelle sigle non le ho trascritte nel nome, ma adesso che me lo hai fatto notare starò più attento in futuro

File source is not properly indicated: File:KABA.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:KABA.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:KABA.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does your bot do???[edit]

Hi .

I don't really understand what you Frescobot is doing... For two of the files of my WL it's the same before and after, no difference...

1, 2.

Can you please explain?  Thank you.. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 04:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+ 1 [3] --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:29, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! The bot removed an invisible LTR character, take a look here and here. I will improve the scripts in order to label as "misplaced invisible LTR marks" all the edits related to these invisible characters. At the moment some of these edits are still labelled just as "link syntax" and it is not enough clear. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:25, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, let's see... --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 16:32, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fukang meteorite cropped.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fukang meteorite cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FrescoBot bug: Undesired change of link[edit]

This change by FrescoBot is not helpful. Please revert and prevent from happening again. Thank you for your effort. Lklundin (talk) 07:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are right: the wikilink to an image should start with ":", but the bot did not recognize it was a link to an image because the url encoding ("%3A" instead of ":"). I fixed the bot and the image description. Thank you for your message. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bot[edit]

Hi, Why you change other users comments, example 1. ?--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is editing in old archive pages 2 and changing users comment. This looks like a malfunction (bot is ignoring namespaces?) and therefore i blocked the bot. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter - Thank you so much for blocking FrescoBot. I'm really sorry, I forgot to put the namespace parameter... Moreover I was able to read the email or check the bot until now (usually I can). I fixed the problem, can you please unblock it when you can? Thanks! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 16:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bot: misplaced invisible LTR marks[edit]

Salve!

Oggi, FrescoBot a rimosso quattro marcature invisibili dalle mie immagine. Grazie, ma mi piacerebbe sapere come queste marcature si sviluppino. Ho studiato le referenze a "misplaced" sulla tua pagina di discussione ma non capisco come questi caratteri entrino nelle mie pagine. Utilizzo solo i dialoghi standard di carica, e non mi ricordo di aver usato mai il copiare e incollare sulle categorie. Di solito li scelgo indicando una parola chiave.

Forse c'è un problema coi dialoghi di carica? Ma intendo bene que questo non sia affare tuo. Lo menziono solo perché forse altri potrebbero riscontrare lo stesso problema.

Ti auguro una giornata splendente (ma non troppo calda). Reinhard (Aisano) -- Aisano (talk) 20:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As I see, you replaced a lot of "invisible LTR marks" in categories, that I created. Could you please tell me, how those "invisible LTR marks" originate? How can I avoid those marks?
Greetings --hdamm (talk) 07:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Probably you copy and paste each category name from the page of the parent category. For example: if you select and copy "Ananta Samakhom Throne Hall‎" from the list in the page Category:Ancient monuments in Bangkok you will get this extra hidden character. In these cases, in order to remove this unwanted extra character, you should paste the name and then try with the backspace to delete the last character: you will notice that apparently the backspace will not work on the first hit due the hidden character. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 05:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Basilicofresco: Yes, that's how I did it. I will try your proposal. Thank you for the info.
BTW: can I somehow detect those LTR marks? --hdamm (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For example you can paste the name in this unicode analyzer or use the "backspace test". -- Basilicofresco (msg) 11:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Grazie per questo consiglio davvero utile! Per caso sai perché WC aggiunge queste marcature LTR ai nomi delle sottocategorie? Se non sono necessari, WC potrebbe risparmiare al tuo bot un montone di lavoro. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, –Totie (talk) 02:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:New In Box (5439835366).jpg[edit]

File:New In Box (5439835366).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

misplaced invisible LTR marks (?)[edit]

Con cortesia se puoi spiegarmi la modifica qio perchè io non riesco a vedere alcuna differenza tra prima e dopo se non un colore evidenziatore che passa da giallo a blu. Grazie.--Lungoleno (talk) 06:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Si tratta di un carattere di controllo invisibile e di lunghezza nulla che per errore ogni tanto viene incollato dentro link e categorie. Se ne è parlato alcune righe sopra. Lo rimuovo perché inutile e soprattutto perché può creare problemi ad alcuni tool automatici e ai bot. Ho già chiesto diverse volte all'autore di Hotcat di filtrarli in modo da ridurre drasticamente la necessità di queste modifiche, ma sostanzialmente per lui va bene così. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 07:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Grazie.--Lungoleno (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link syntax[edit]

Hi Basilicofresco, seeing this change i wonder why your bot does not replace the link of the source. Regrads, --Arnd (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Aschroet: Hi! Well, the main reason is that at the moment FrescoBot is only replacing links to Commons and not to other sister projects. Links to Commons should be written without any doubt with the double square brakets syntax, but it is not clear if there is consensus about converting for example [http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Circuit_spa_old.png] to [[w:ru:Файл:Circuit spa old.png]]. What do you think? Has it been already discussed somewhere? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 05:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Basilicofresco, ok understand. Unfortunately, i do not know if it has been discussed somewhere. Regards, --Arnd (talk) 04:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rik Van Looy.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rik Van Looy.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rik Van Looy.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:FrescoBot[edit]

Congratulations! Task 3 was approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

039[edit]

What's the problem with sequence 039 in the modifications of your bot ? : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corpus_Inscriptionum_Latinarum,_Vol_XIII,_12000_-_12999&diff=210485689&oldid=133294689 for example. Please, be really carefull. Nonopoly (talk) 11:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

STOP YOUR BOT NOW !! so many mistakes !! please do it now. Nonopoly (talk) 11:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not in the bot... it is in the gallery. As you can see the "CIL XIII 12039" was duplicate. The bot encountered the same image with the same caption in the same gallery twice, and then removed one of them. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 17:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's your bot. What's the problem with that : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corpus_Inscriptionum_Latinarum,_Vol_III,_11000_-_11999&diff=210479554&oldid=132804714 ? Nonopoly (talk) 19:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that one: the caption 11039 was present twice, therefore was considered a duplicate image as stated by the bot. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 19:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frescobot breaks language specific gallery links[edit]

Hi! I just noticed your bot broke the gallery in File:Freight bike construction types.svg. (see [4]) I undid the changes in this case but did not check for other occurences. Could you please fix this problem? Thanks! Tkarcher (talk) 12:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Fixed. I will check for other occurrences as soon as possibile. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 14:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I noticed the same problem here special:Diff/211879615. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does Frescobot mean by this?[edit]

Hi there. I noticed a change to the gallery page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_(1987_film). There used to be "center" at the beginning of the file list and "/center" at the end, but the bot removed the "/center". Why is that? Please explain. --Judithcomm (talk) 08:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Judithcomm! The opening center tag was outside the gallery, but the closing tag was inside, and it is not correct. The /center tag had to be placed after the /gallery tag, not before. De facto there was one opening center tag outside the gallery without any closing tag and one closing center tag inside the gallery without any opening tag. The bot removed the latter. Now I fixed the page. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 22:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. --Judithcomm (talk) 11:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected all my pages now. Cheers --Judithcomm (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning inside <nowiki>[edit]

I see that the bot tried to fix a url within a nowiki at File:John Polidori.jpeg. Might be worth looking to skip such. I manually resolved the others that your bot was seen as adding blacklisted urls.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: Hi! Actually nowiki exclusion was already in place, but that specific substitution was able to ignore it due a strange behaviour... in any case now it is fixed. Nevertheless a blacklisted url should be removed on sight, so I'm not sure that silencing the bot in order to avoid warnings is the best approach. I mean, it could help to spot disguised blacklisted urls. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 12:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invisible characters in files of Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories by ID[edit]

Panoramio upload bot made hundreds or thousands of defective category tags, containing the invisible character :Left-to-right mark (U+200E) at the bottom of the ID number (see this diff as an example. (Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 5467819‎ needing categories corrected to Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 5467819 needing categories.) This defect blocks the Cat-a-lot tool. Could you fix this error globally and daily? Thank You. --ŠJů (talk) 13:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I'll start again the bot. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 04:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, if you have a chance to start your bot again, there are thousands of new files from Panoramio upload bot to be cleaned up. Regards, --Sitacuisses (talk) 23:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Have you contacted the Bot operator so he may fix this for future uploads ? --Denniss (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that he has been alerted before, but his command of English may be limited, and that doesn't make him the most responsive person here. There are more issues related to his uploads that deserve to be fixed, but adressing all of this requires some preparation and collaboration. --Sitacuisses (talk) 13:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have no time to fix this problem recently, I have no time to fix this problem recently, but the bot has finished uploading the photo--shizhao (talk) 02:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I started FrescoBot again! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 16:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eclipse 1868 Letter of Mongkut to Grehan.pdf[edit]

Why does your bot change the link here: [5] ? The syntax was used intentionally. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 06:11, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, I will fix it. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 10:57, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks --тнояsтеn ⇔ 12:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Segnaposto[edit]

Grazie tante della dritta, Basilico! Appena posso passo a revisionare un tot di "vuoti". Grazie ancora :) --Lalupa (talk) 12:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brenham AMNH.jpg[edit]

File:Brenham AMNH.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid characters[edit]

Hello Basilicofresco, not long ago i came across a file with a date that was not parsed properly. I could repair it by removing some kind of invisible character, see [6]. Since i know your bot is also removing such characters from categories i wonder if it would make sense to generally remove these characters. --Arnd (talk) 21:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see your bot working, thanks. At least one other date already has been repaired, [7]. Regards, --Arnd (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Aschroet: No problem. As soon I found a reliable way to avoid the exceptions I started the bot. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 20:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ThunderbirdsT38.jpg[edit]

File:ThunderbirdsT38.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{nobot}}[edit]

C'est une histoire ancienne. Il y avait bien une raison ... que j'ai oublié. On peut les enlever lorsqu'ils existent encore, ce que je vais essayer de faire de mon côté. Cordialement.
Google trad : It's an old story. There was a reason ... that I forgot. We can remove them when they still exist, which I will try to do on my side. Best regards.
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

please consider splitting your edits[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for your work with User:FrescoBot. I ran into this edit, and I had a hard time finding whether any substantial edits were made. I appreciate that a lot of people probably ask you to merge edits together, but this kind of mass edits make it impossible to find what really changed. In this case, it was an understandable but wrong deletion of the image from the winners gallery. Quite impactful.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could in the future split the edits at least when they are this large. First do an edit with all the minor stuff that nobody will have a problem with, and then do an edit with the substantial changes. That way, people can more easily track what happens. I'd say this becomes relevant when you edit more than 10 lines at the same time. Thanks! Effeietsanders (talk) 03:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I understand your point and the fact that combining many changes in one single edit may somewhat reduce the probability of spotting "the important one". However there is not an easy solution for it. I mean, I cannot split the minor changes (mainly about spacings and syntax cleaning) from the rest because it is forbidden to apply only minor changes without any substantial change. So I should completely switch off the minor changes and it would be a pity. In this specific case there was 1 nonexistent image, 10 wrong double pipes, few gallery tag on the same line of an image and hundreds of unnecessary spaces. I guess that I could switch off the unnecessary spaces cleaning, but it helps to uniform the source text. Nevertheless I believe that you should rely on the edit summary: as you can see, the bot clearly specified that "nonexistent images" were found. It should be enough to give a clear idea of the main problem. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 08:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
Well, I would argue that this policy is open for interpretation :) If you do two edits in rapid succession in these scenarios, it would still comply with the objective of the policy (don't pollute watchlists with too many minor edits). I cannot imagine anyone having a problem with that (although I admit, I have been surprised before). I don't mind the minor edits, but it took me three minutes to find the change, even though I was aware what to look for due to the summary. Especially on pages like this, it is essential that someone sees what images you remove. The alternative is that I have to apply a nobots tag to these pages. It's not your fault that images get wrongly deleted (or moved without redirect, or in this case: a typo was made), but the removal of the name from the gallery does make it harder to spot these problems. I imagine the same problem may be true for other galleries where completeness is essential. Effeietsanders (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160139546).jpg[edit]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160139546).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160164308).jpg[edit]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160164308).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160165788).jpg[edit]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160165788).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160167722).jpg[edit]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160167722).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160169710).jpg[edit]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160169710).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum manuals (7160157926).jpg[edit]

File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum manuals (7160157926).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bot down[edit]

Hi, You'r bot seems down, please restart. I wrote you a mail a few days ago. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Steinsplitter: FrescoBot has come back! :) -- Basilicofresco (msg) 16:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fake external links[edit]

Hi are you still running this task? User:FrescoBot/Details#Fake_external_links There is thousands.--BevinKacon (talk) 16:40, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File name with "!" causes problems[edit]

In Pierre-Auguste Renoir catalog raisonné, 1972, bot deleted lines, for example "Renoir - woman-in-a-lace-blouse-1869.jpg!PinterestLarge.jpg|40". --Maltaper (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Maltaper: You are right... the problem is that a filename like that one with a false .jpg extension followed by an exclamation mark is a common typo and the bot is assuming that imagename is invalid... ok, maybe I should try to verify it before fixing it (it would be complex), but in my humble opinion first of all that kind of filenames should be avoided. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carbo meteorite, Royal Ontario Museum.jpg[edit]

File:Carbo meteorite, Royal Ontario Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manitouwabing meteorite, Royal Ontario Museum.jpg[edit]

File:Manitouwabing meteorite, Royal Ontario Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Renoise 2.6.png[edit]

File:Renoise 2.6.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

94.73.50.242 19:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Visible mark removed[edit]

Hi! I don’t know what invisible mark you wanted to remove here, but you ended up removing a totally visible space, which is required at that position by the French typographic conventions. Please be more careful next time. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 10:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastiano Ricci catalog raisonné, 1976[edit]

FrescoBot deleted this file as nonexistent. --Maltaper (talk) 17:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FrescoBot[edit]

At its user page, FrescoBot says: The maximum edit rate will be about 6 edits per minute. Thats not true at the moment, today it made, from 6:55-7:12, 500 edits in 17 minutes. TheRunnerUp (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRunnerUp: Hi! You are right, the speed written on the userpage was really outdated and it was running a bit faster than 12 edits per minute. I updated the userpage to the standard maximum speed value I've been using for years: 12 edits per minute. I also better adjusted the speed limit. - Basilicofresco (msg) 08:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot that sees the invisible![edit]

I have had some categories that should have worked but didn't. If I paste the category, then it works. I am usually typing but often paste, so: I am wondering if it is me with the ltr characters or if it is something else.

I have Category:Joesph Smit that does not work, but Category:Joseph Smit does work!

I like your bot. I cannot do what it does easily.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing images from gallery[edit]

Hi. Is there a way to prevent FrescoBot from editing a gallery page? This edit removed an item from a gallery because the picture went missing. In this case it's not ideal as the gallery page shows all winners of the ISAF sailor of the year award and allows to keep track of who has a picture and who doesn't. Cheers. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Breakage[edit]

This edit broke the {{Tu}} template. It should not have inserted |1=. Glrx (talk) 03:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the problem, fixed! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 12:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries[edit]

Please do not touch user galleries and please do not add useless empty lines: Revision of 815551992. Thank you. --XRay 💬 06:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fix it. Thanks! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 12:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Basilicofresco&oldid=826175868"